Hurricane Sandy Could Put National Disaster Response and Relief in the Campaign Spotlight

The unexpected appearance, and harsh realities of Hurricane Sandy (or the Frankenstorm) upon the Northeast, perhaps put a new question before U.S. voters as they prepare to cast their Presidential ballot. Recently the Washington Post took at look at the two candidates history and perspectives on disaster response and relief.

Obama has been aggressive about bolstering the federal government’s capability to respond to disasters, while his Republican challenger believes that states should be the primary responders in such situations and has suggested that disaster response could be privatized.

Water, wind and fire damage mark destruction already caused by Hurricane Sandy. Top: New Jersey shoreline Bottom: Queens NYC
(Photos: New York Times)

Obama campaigned four years ago on a promise to revamp the federal government’s disaster-
response functions and has embraced changes long sought by state governors and professional emergency managers. Since becoming president, he has led the federal response to multiple natural disasters, including tornadoes, flooding and major hurricanes, learning from government stumbles during the presidency of George W. Bush — most notably in the case of Hurricane Katrina in 2005. Obama’s posture has been to order federal agencies to aggressively prepare for and respond to major storms and other disasters.

As governor of Massachusetts, Romney requested federal disaster assistance for storm cleanup, and he has toured storm-ravaged communities as a presidential candidate, but he has agreed with some who suggest that the Federal Emergency Management Agency could be dissolved as part of budget cuts.

When moderator John King suggested during a June 2011 CNN debate that federal disaster response could be curtailed to save federal dollars, Romney said: “Absolutely. Every time you have an occasion to take something from the federal government and send it back to the states, that’s the right direction. And if you can go even further and send it back to the private sector, that’s even better.”

Romney has not made similar comments since that debate, and his aides insisted Monday that he would not abolish FEMA if he became president.

“Governor Romney believes that states should be in charge of emergency management in responding to storms and other natural disasters in their jurisdictions,” said campaign spokeswoman Amanda Henneberg. “As the first responders, states are in the best position to aid affected individuals and communities and to direct resources and assistance to where they are needed most. This includes help from the federal government and FEMA.”

Source: Hurricane Sandy Highlights How Obama and Romney Respond to Disasters (Washington Post)

But as the Washington Post goes on to note, this is exactly how the system works currently.

In the days ahead, this issue, not addressed in any prior debate or advertisements, may likely find its way to the top of the national debate.