Philanthropy Can Spot Innovations, But Has Limits:

Gates & Turner Call on Government Engagement

As the world’s major industrialized nations come together in France for the G-20 summit, they will be joined by one of the world’s richest men, Bill Gates. You might think the Microsoft co-founder is there to discuss the role of technology in addressing the world economic crisis, but in fact he is there to discuss the need for nations to continue their work against global poverty and disease.

Gates famously has turned much of his time and money to global philanthropy. Including supporting efforts to increase education overseas, eliminating hunger and addressing “orphan” third-world diseases that impact millions. His funds have helped tremendously and lead to important innovations; however, he is there to stress the need for national partners in the developed world too. A point he emphasize Monday in a Washington Post editorial.

Fifty years ago, almost 20 million children under the age of 5 died every year. In 2010, the figure was down to 7.6 million . This 60 percent decline in childhood deaths — reflecting advances in agriculture, education, health and sanitation — is compelling evidence of the increasing justice in our world.

But the global economic crisis is putting the long-term trend of progress at risk, as Congress’s debates about the foreign aid budget underscore….[But it is] programs funded by U.S. generosity have been a core component of this 50-year project of raising living standards around the world.

Aid is targeted to fill specific gaps in development. The most important of these gaps is innovation. When the private sector doesn’t have incentive, and poor governments don’t have the money, smart aid pays for breakthrough solutions. The green revolution that fed a billion people in the 1950s and ’60s never would have happened without advanced agricultural science funded by U.S. aid. [And] in just the past 10 years, millions of children have been saved from diseases such as measles and whooping cough by vaccines that Americans paid for through their contribution to an organization called the GAVI Alliance. Immunization is a great example of how aid can be effective. Thirty-six cents worth of measles vaccine protects a child for a lifetime.

Source: Opinion: Bill Gates’s plan to assist the world’s poor

What makes this editorial and advocacy perhaps even more profound a statement coming from one of the world’s richest men, is that just 15 years ago this is the same Bill Gates who was practically outed and shamed by CNN founder Ted Turner for a relatively poor track record of philanthropy.
Back then, in 1997, Turner famously started one of the largest trends among billionaires in philanthropy when he made a donation of $1 billion (yes, billion with a B) to the United Nations – funds that helped launch the UN Foundation. And Turner has never shied away from his earlier giving decision. Just this week he offered his own reflections on his UN donation as the world body estimated we topped 7-billion inhabitants.
One of the smartest investments I ever made was my $1 billion gift to the United Nations, which led to the creation of the United Nations Foundation. The United Nations is the only institution with the international scale, reach and capacity to address today’s toughest challenges. If we want to ensure that we leave our children and grandchildren a safe and healthy world, then it is critical for world leaders to support the U.N.’s vital work on voluntary family planning and reproductive health for women across the globe.
But while he’s proud of that contribution he still steps up to the plate and emphasizes that governments of the world should not leave the poor behind. He also chimes in on the current predictions about US foreign aid cuts and their potentially dangerous impact on world outcomes.

The current economic climate has forced Congress to take a long, hard look at its spending and rightly make some tough choices. However, far too often in this debate, the needs of women and children are the first items heaped onto the chopping block.This year’s budget discussion has been no exception. Two of the most disturbing and shortsighted of the foreign aid budget cuts are those in funding for international family planning and the U.N. Population Fund. The fund is an agency focused on assisting governments in delivering quality sexual and reproductive health care — including voluntary family planning — throughout the life cycle of women across the globe who want and need it.

Source: CNN Editorial: 7 billion reasons to empower women

Much as we are having domestic debates about the role of government in private business investment, we need to realize there is a similar one going on behind the scenes globally on foreign aid. And these wealthy businessmen are clearly telling us that we must have the wealthiest governments of the world involved in order to make the rest of the world prosper.