Matthew Watkins, Texas Tribune
Texas’ elected leaders lashed out Tuesday at President Obama’s executive orders prompting more background checks during gun purchases. But those officials offered no specifics on how they planned to fight Obama’s actions, and some gun rights advocates dismissed the president’s proposals as mostly insignificant.
While Gov. Greg Abbott said that Obama “trampled” on the Bill of Rights, Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick called the ideas “political posturing and more propaganda.” But no immediate official action was announced by state leaders.
“Despite the President’s latest attempt to undermine our liberty,” Abbott said in a statement, “Texas will take every action to protect the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding citizens.”
Texas has a penchant for suing over Obama’s executive orders. But it’s unclear whether there are any plans in the works. Any lawsuit would probably be filed by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton. Asked if the AG’s office was pursuing one, Paxton spokeswoman Cynthia Meyer said the office was “keeping a close eye on the issue.”
Paxton said in a statement that he stood ready “to fight back against any overreach that will deny or infringe on” the rights of gun owners.
In a post on his Facebook page, Texas House Speaker Joe Straus said the announcement showed “why we need to elect a Republican President who will not overstep his authority and who will protect the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding citizens.”
Obama tearfully announced his executive actions from the East Room of the White House on Tuesday. He said he plans to increase the number of vendors who are required to conduct criminal background checks when they sell guns. He said he will also hire more federal employees to handle those reviews and require dealers to inform federal authorities when a gun sold online is lost or stolen during transit. Obama also ordered U.S. attorney’s offices across the state to step up their domestic violence prevention efforts.
The Obama administration has said his actions are clarifications and interpretations of current law and that no actions from Congress are needed. And the ideas are modest compared with new gun control laws that Obama has tried and failed to pass.
Edwin Walker, president of Texas Law Shield, which provides legal services to gun owners, agreed that the orders were simply a clarification of how the law should be interpreted and enforced. Obama can’t add new restrictions, so the orders appear to be aimed for a purely political effect, Walker said.
“It really won’t change much,” he said. “However, what he is hoping it will do is ignite a fire” that spurs more legislative action on guns.
The state would only have a reason to sue if the Obama administration were ordering the states to do something different than what they are currently doing.
“I don’t see anything in his orders that would do that,” Walker said.
But Texas leaders said Obama is going too far.
“The president may not personally like it, but we have the constitutional right to protect ourselves, our families and our businesses,” Patrick said. “If the president’s goal is to sincerely help protect Americans, he should make it easier to legally purchase, train and use their weapons of choice for protection than trot out phony new regulations to stand in their way.”
Republican members of the Texas congressional delegation also raised complaints.
“The president’s actions punish law-abiding citizens. Our country would be much safer if he were half as tough on criminals as he is on innocent Americans,” U.S. Rep. Lamar Smith, R-San Antonio, said in a statement Tuesday.
The order “is a blatant abuse of his executive authority,” said U.S. Rep. Pete Sessions, R-Dallas. “This is a misguided and unconstitutional power grab, and I will not stand for it.”
But U.S. Rep. Eddie Bernice Johnson, D-Dallas, said that Obama’s actions would help reduce gun violence.
“The President’s decisive actions today will strengthen background checks, protect communities through better enforcement, improve mental health services, and fuel research to make guns safer,” she said in a statement.
U.S. Sen. and Republican presidential candidate Ted Cruz said Tuesday that Obama’s executive actions on guns “aren’t worth the paper they’re written on,” reiterating his promise to repeal every “illegal and unconstitutional” executive order upon taking office.
“This has been the most anti-gun administration in the history of our country,” Cruz told reporters before a campaign event in Cherokee, Iowa.
Discussing the anticipated order on Monday, Cruz extended his criticism to Democratic presidential frontrunner Hillary Clinton, calling it “entirely backwards” that Obama and the former secretary of state want to impose new gun restrictions as the country faces the threat of radical Islamic terrorism.
“We don’t beat the bad guys by taking away our guns,” Cruz said. “We beat the bad guys by using our guns.”
[This story originally appeared in the The Texas Tribune]
- Video: President Obama Delivers Remarks On Reducing Gun Violence (Houston Public Media)
- Sheila Jackson Lee seeks to bolster Obama gun initiative (Houston Chronicle)
- FACT CHECK: Obama’s gun proposals may fall short of goals (Houston Chronicle/AP)
- White House seeks Abbott’s help on gun background checks (Houston Chronicle)